Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1733 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 47 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4810MQ - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |