Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2135 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 47 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 131% better in Cities: Skylines II than Core i7-4810MQ - 37 vs 16 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 48 vs 8 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$33.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1244.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,244.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |