Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i7-4810MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1716 days newer than Core i7-4810MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 47 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-4810MQ - 239 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4810MQ - 48 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4810MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |