Buy on Amazon
$274.5
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $312
Availability
MSRP in USD: $312
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790S outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4790S is 1393 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790S
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-760 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-4790S - $100.0 vs $274.5
- Up to 60% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4790S - $0.85 vs $2.14 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-4790S Processor (8M Cache, 3.2 GHz) BX80646I74790S
Buy for $274.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-760 Processor 2.8 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4790S
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790S | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
