Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4922 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $100.0 vs $229.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14400 - $0.87 vs $1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - 152 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2894 minutes ago
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2894 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |