Buy on Amazon
$101.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $350
Availability
MSRP in USD: $350
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4770K outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4770K is 222 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - 171 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than FX-8300 - $101.75 vs $112.02
- Up to 19% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - $0.6 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4770K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Core I7 4770K I7-4770K SR147 3.5 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 84W LGA 1150
Buy for $101.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6175 minutes ago
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4770K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
