Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1782 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-4765T - 134 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $99.97 vs $498.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-4765T - $0.75 vs $3.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4765T - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11016 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11016 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |