Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i7-4702HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1954 days newer than Core i7-4702HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- Consumes up to 85% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 37 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4702HQ - 165 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702HQ - 48 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$739
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4702HQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |