Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2530 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 47 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4700MQ - 561 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4700MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
