Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Core i7-4700HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2530 days newer than Core i7-4700HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 47 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i7-4700HQ - 202 vs 201 FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |