Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4600M outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4600M is 372 days older than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 179 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 37 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
