Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3960X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4069 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $295.16 vs $899.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-13400F - $1.14 vs $3.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Core i7-3960X - 287 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 16 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
259
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $295.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.14/FPS
36%
Price, $
$899.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |