Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 71 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G540 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $19.25 vs $350.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Control than Core i7-3960X - $0.1 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |