Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i7-3940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 735 days newer than Core i7-3940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3940XM
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 55 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-3940XM - 303 vs 299 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3940XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-3940XM
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3940XM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
