Buy on Amazon
$269.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 748 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G1820 - 225 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $46.41 vs $269.5
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-3930K Hexa-Core Processor 3.2 Ghz 12 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73930K
Buy for $269.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76028 minutes ago
Intel CPU BX80646G1820 Celeron G1820 2.70GHz 2M LGA1150 2C/2T Haswell
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
81.02310231023102%
Multi-Core
825
27.86220871327254%
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
