Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3613 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $319.88 vs $432.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-12900F - $1.27 vs $1.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3820 - 275 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 24 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
251
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
80%
Price, $
$432.99
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |