Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 162 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Celeron G540 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $19.25 vs $319.88
- Up to 94% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-3820 - $0.15 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4352 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
128
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |