Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2445 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 41% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3770T - 360 vs 255 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-3770T - $85.0 vs $94.08
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $94.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74083 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
605
43.90420899854862%
Multi-Core
1964
40.628878775341335%
Intel Core i7-3770T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |