Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2181 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770S - 170 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $210.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770S - $1.24 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |