Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 856 days older than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8370 - 156 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $234.98 vs $295.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770S - $1.55 vs $1.89 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Buy for $234.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |