Buy on Amazon
$122.03
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $122.03 vs $275.98
- Up to 49% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900 - $1.03 vs $2.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770 - 137 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
118
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10711 minutes ago
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
51%
Price, $
$275.98
44%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10711 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
