Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i7-3632QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 689 days newer than Core i7-3632QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3632QM
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3632QM - 123 vs 116 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3632QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 135 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |