Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3537 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3612QM - 272 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3612QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$249.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |