Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-3612QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2445 days newer than Core i7-3612QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3612QM
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3612QM - 175 vs 167 FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3612QM | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |