Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4509 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 56% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-2960XM - 281 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2960XM - 32 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
281
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$528.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $528.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |