Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 659 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-2920XM - 176 vs 175 FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |