Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 3155 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-2860QM - 218 vs 207 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15557 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |