Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i7-2720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3473 days newer than Core i7-2720QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2720QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-2720QM - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2720QM - 24 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3459 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2720QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |