Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1344 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-2635QM - 97 vs 91 FPS
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 135 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |