Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2846 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 45 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2635QM - 171 vs 154 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |