Buy on Amazon
$210
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2663 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 31% better in War Thunder than Core i7-2635QM - 170 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 16 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-2635QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-2635QM or Ryzen 7 2700X
War Thunder, 1920 x 1080, Movie
124 FPS
$11.29/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
