Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i7-2630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3473 days newer than Core i7-2630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 26% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-2630QM - 135 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2630QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2630QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |