Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3399 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-2600S - 217 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-2600S - $104.99 vs $235.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-2600S - $0.48 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 12 vs 8 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
207
95.39170506912443%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
42.10526315789474%
Price, $
$235
44%
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$104.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
40.54242002781641%
Multi-Core
1811
31.49017562163102%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |