Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3467 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $235.0 vs $295.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $2.01 vs $2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-2600S - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600S - 24 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
117
93.60000000000001%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3144 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
85.16949152542372%
Price, $
$295
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
583
33.718912666281085%
Multi-Core
1811
18.05583250249252%
Intel Core i7-2600S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |