Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - $69.0 vs $200.65
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10500 - $0.38 vs $1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-2600K - 169 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
157
92.89940828402366%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
31.9327731092437%
Price, $
$200.65
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $200.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
43.976300197498354%
Multi-Core
2320
42.413162705667276%
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |