Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2600K is 276 days older than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than FX-8150 - 113 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8150 - $79.0 vs $82.02
- Up to 7% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8150 - $0.7 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52690 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
110
97.34513274336283%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
93.33333333333333%
Price, $
$82.02
96%
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |