Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 361 days older than the cheaper Core i7-14700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $323.53 vs $575.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700F - 225 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $323.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74159 minutes ago
Buy for $575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Single-Core
2775
89.3719806763285%
Multi-Core
17332
79.38441808271882%
Intel Core i7-14700F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |