Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 5062 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 51% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-920 - 134 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $90.0 vs $319.99
- Up to 58% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700K - $1.01 vs $2.39 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
42%
Price, $
$319.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6132 minutes ago
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |