Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 45% better in Rust than Core i5-6400 - 263 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $68.64 vs $313.71
- Up to 68% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-13700K - $0.38 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
31%
Price, $
$313.71
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $313.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
182
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |