Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $79.0 vs $317.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700KF - $0.67 vs $2.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6400 - 138 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
29%
Price, $
$317.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |