Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700K outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700K is 1836 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 186 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $229.99 vs $799.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.24 vs $4.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700K - 44 vs 20 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 22 |
20 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |