Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 15% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-6900K - 120 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - $120.0 vs $220.47
- Up to 38% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-11700 - $1.15 vs $1.84 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.84/FPS
62%
Price, $
$220.47
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $220.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1439 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
104
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1439 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |