Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2768 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3240T - 179 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10875H | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |