Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7100T - 280 vs 269 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $51.6 vs $208.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.19 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
25%
Price, $
$208.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15785 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
269
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |