Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 246 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $135.0 vs $214.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.57 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
65%
Price, $
$214.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
237
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |