Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 25% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 131 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $236.0 vs $819.3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 32 vs 16 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $236 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75230 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
105
80.1526717557252%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
28%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
68.6400937866354%
Multi-Core
7539
92.5939572586588%
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |