Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $110.0 vs $235.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700K - $0.62 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
50%
Price, $
$235.99
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |