Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-10320 - 209 vs 204 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $120.0 vs $180.12
- Up to 31% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i5-9600KF - $0.59 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
68%
Price, $
$180.12
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $180.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10782 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |