Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 879 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Core i3-10105F - 178 vs 175 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $85.13 vs $145.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-9600K - $0.49 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 8 vs 6 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7578 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |