Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2319 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G645 - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $40.99 vs $80.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-9400F - $0.27 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
58.69565217391305%
Price, $
$80
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3702 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
151
86.7816091954023%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $40.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3697 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
465
33.744557329462985%
Multi-Core
800
16.54944145635085%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Pentium G645 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |